<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>LLMs | Tharindu Cyril Weerasooriya</title><link>https://stable--cyrilhome.netlify.app/tags/llms/</link><atom:link href="https://stable--cyrilhome.netlify.app/tags/llms/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>LLMs</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Subasa - Adapting Language Models for Low-resourced Offensive Language Detection in Sinhala</title><link>https://stable--cyrilhome.netlify.app/publication/haturusinghe-etal-2025-subasa/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://stable--cyrilhome.netlify.app/publication/haturusinghe-etal-2025-subasa/</guid><description/></item><item><title>ARTICLE: Annotator Reliability Through In-Context Learning</title><link>https://stable--cyrilhome.netlify.app/publication/dutta-2024-articleannotatorreliabilityincontext/</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://stable--cyrilhome.netlify.app/publication/dutta-2024-articleannotatorreliabilityincontext/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When humans label data for AI (like deciding if a tweet is offensive), how do we know who&amp;rsquo;s doing good work versus who&amp;rsquo;s careless or biased? Traditional methods struggle because on subjective tasks, sincere people genuinely disagree. We built ARTICLE, which uses large language models to check if an annotator&amp;rsquo;s labels are internally consistent and align with what the AI predicts. This helps identify reliable annotators without silencing minority perspectives—crucial for building fair AI systems that don&amp;rsquo;t just reflect the majority view.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Blind Spot Navigation in Large Language Model Reasoning with Thought Space Explorer</title><link>https://stable--cyrilhome.netlify.app/publication/zhang-2025-blindspotnavigationlarge/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://stable--cyrilhome.netlify.app/publication/zhang-2025-blindspotnavigationlarge/</guid><description>
&lt;div class="callout flex px-4 py-3 mb-6 rounded-md border-l-4 bg-blue-100 dark:bg-blue-900 border-blue-500"
data-callout="note"
data-callout-metadata=""&gt;
&lt;span class="callout-icon pr-3 pt-1 text-blue-600 dark:text-blue-300"&gt;
&lt;svg height="24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 24 24"&gt;&lt;path fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="1.5" d="m16.862 4.487l1.687-1.688a1.875 1.875 0 1 1 2.652 2.652L6.832 19.82a4.5 4.5 0 0 1-1.897 1.13l-2.685.8l.8-2.685a4.5 4.5 0 0 1 1.13-1.897zm0 0L19.5 7.125"/&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-content dark:text-neutral-300"&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-title font-semibold mb-1"&gt;Note&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="callout-body"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Presenting at NeurIPS (Math-AI Workshop)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Date:&lt;/strong&gt; December 6, 2025&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Time:&lt;/strong&gt; Sat 3:30 p.m. - 4:15 p.m.
&lt;strong&gt;Location:&lt;/strong&gt; NeurIPS 2025 - Workshop Upper Level Ballroom 6A
&lt;strong&gt;Session Type:&lt;/strong&gt; Poster Session&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>ProRefine: Inference-Time Prompt Refinement with Textual Feedback</title><link>https://stable--cyrilhome.netlify.app/publication/pandita-2025-prorefineinferencetimepromptrefinement/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://stable--cyrilhome.netlify.app/publication/pandita-2025-prorefineinferencetimepromptrefinement/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When multiple AI agents work together (like one agent planning and another executing), they rely heavily on good prompts. But writing perfect prompts is hard, and even small mistakes can cascade through the system, causing failures. ProRefine solves this by creating a feedback loop: one AI agent evaluates how well the prompt worked and suggests improvements, then another agent refines the prompt based on that feedback—all happening automatically at inference time without any training.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We tested ProRefine on mathematical reasoning tasks and it improved accuracy by 3-37% compared to standard methods. Even better, it lets smaller, cheaper AI models perform nearly as well as much larger, expensive ones. This makes powerful AI more accessible and cost-effective, especially for complex multi-agent systems that are becoming critical in commercial applications.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Harnessing Business and Media Insights with Large Language Models</title><link>https://stable--cyrilhome.netlify.app/publication/bao-harnessing-2024/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://stable--cyrilhome.netlify.app/publication/bao-harnessing-2024/</guid><description/></item></channel></rss>