<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>In-Context Learning | Tharindu Cyril Weerasooriya</title><link>https://stable--cyrilhome.netlify.app/tags/in-context-learning/</link><atom:link href="https://stable--cyrilhome.netlify.app/tags/in-context-learning/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>In-Context Learning</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>ARTICLE: Annotator Reliability Through In-Context Learning</title><link>https://stable--cyrilhome.netlify.app/publication/dutta-2024-articleannotatorreliabilityincontext/</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://stable--cyrilhome.netlify.app/publication/dutta-2024-articleannotatorreliabilityincontext/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When humans label data for AI (like deciding if a tweet is offensive), how do we know who&amp;rsquo;s doing good work versus who&amp;rsquo;s careless or biased? Traditional methods struggle because on subjective tasks, sincere people genuinely disagree. We built ARTICLE, which uses large language models to check if an annotator&amp;rsquo;s labels are internally consistent and align with what the AI predicts. This helps identify reliable annotators without silencing minority perspectives—crucial for building fair AI systems that don&amp;rsquo;t just reflect the majority view.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>