<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Sarah K. Luger | Tharindu Cyril Weerasooriya</title><link>https://stable--cyrilhome.netlify.app/authors/sarah-k.-luger/</link><atom:link href="https://stable--cyrilhome.netlify.app/authors/sarah-k.-luger/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Sarah K. Luger</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Rater Cohesion and Quality from a Vicarious Perspective</title><link>https://stable--cyrilhome.netlify.app/publication/pandita-etal-2024-rater/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://stable--cyrilhome.netlify.app/publication/pandita-etal-2024-rater/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When labeling controversial content (like tweets about politics), people&amp;rsquo;s own beliefs strongly influence what they find offensive. We used &amp;ldquo;vicarious annotation&amp;rdquo;—asking people not just &amp;ldquo;Is this offensive to you?&amp;rdquo; but also &amp;ldquo;Would a Democrat/Republican/Independent find this offensive?&amp;rdquo; This revealed fascinating patterns: Republicans were the worst at predicting how others would react, and disagreement spiked on hot-button issues like gun control and abortion. Understanding these patterns helps us build content moderation AI that doesn&amp;rsquo;t just reflect one group&amp;rsquo;s values while silencing others.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>